Working disconnect

Not really surprising but disconcerting nonetheless:

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/executives-think-they-know-the-top-reasons-employees-quit-theyre-dead-wrong/

“Here are the top three reasons that executives said they believe employees quit their jobs:

  1. Compensation (52%)
  2. Poor career advancement (37%)
  3. Performance (37%)

Monitor your Cisco ASA like an expert

And here are the top three reasons why employees said they actually quit, according to past worker surveys:

  1. Bad bosses: Bad managers account for 75% of voluntary turnover. (Source: SHRM)
  2. Lack of recognition: Only 1 in 3 employees strongly agree that they are properly recognized for their contributions. And people who routinely feel ignored are twice as likely to quit. (Source: Gallup)
  3. Burnout: 50% of millennials, 40% of Gen X, and 35% of baby boomers said burnout makes them leave their jobs. (Source: Staples Workplace Study)”

Guess when you sit at the top it’s easier to live in denial.

Laugh or cry

So many times at work, if we didn’t laugh then we’d have to cry…

Published
Categorized as hmmm, Work

Work distractions

Not being distracted BY your work, lol, but distractions AT work to keep you from, you know, actually working.  Here’s the real culprit that sucks down productivity:

[https://gigaom.com/2017/10/13/millennial-optimism-about-workplace-technology-ignores-a-key-problem-ourselves/]

Millenial Optimism About Workplace Technology Ignores a Key Problem — Ourselves

Curt Steinhorst – Oct 13, 2017

The bright, shiny future of meetings in augmented reality, AI assistants, smart workspaces built on the internet of things, and other Jetsonian office technologies fast approaches—and American workers can’t wait for them to improve productivity. A year ago, Stowe Boyd presented research here on Gigaom that found significant optimism about the potential for technology to make work easier and more collaborative.(1) Unsurprisingly, the research found this positivity strongest among Millennials.(2)

However, that same research found that nearly half of Millennials believe the biggest time waster at work is glitchy or broken technology. Millennial frustration with current technology might explain their simultaneous wide-eyed excitement about cool, acronymed stuff like VR, AI, and IoT. This is at odds with the overall population, which perceives wasteful meetings and excessive email as the biggest enemy of efficiency.(3)

The problem is, both diagnoses are wrong. Research shows that the most significant barrier to productivity, by far, is the good, old-fashioned problem of getting distracted. It’s not that distractions exist—it’s that we succumb to them.

Put another way: poor tech and erupting inboxes don’t waste our time—we do. We have lost our ability to choose where we spend our attention.

In one survey, 87% of employees admitted to reading political social media posts at work.(4) Other research shows that 60% of online purchases occur between 9am and 5pm and that 70% of U.S. porn viewing also happens during working hours (“working” from home?).(5) And if none of that convinces you, perhaps this will: Facebook’s busiest hours are 1-3pm—right in the middle of the workday.

To be clear, this isn’t just a Millennial problem. The 2016 Nielson Social Media Report reveals that Gen Xers use social media 6 hours, 58 minutes per week—10% more than Millennials.(6) Overall media consumption tells the same story: Gen Xers clock in at 31 hours and 40 minutes per week, nearly 20% more than Millennials.

And if there weren’t enough, each instance of distraction comes at a significant cost. An experiment in Great Britain showed that people who tried to juggle work with e-mails and texts lost an average of 10 IQ points, the same loss as working after a sleepless night.(7) And this affects essentially every office worker, every day.

What’s to be done, then? Fortunately, if you’ve read this far, you’ve already done the most important thing: understand that the true problem doesn’t lie anywhere but in our own lack of focus.

Regaining focus—becoming focus-wise, as I like to call it—doesn’t require a rejection of technology, however. Becoming focus-wise only requires we reconfigure our tech usage habits.

For instance, instead of expecting ourselves (and our employees) to be 100% available throughout the day to emails, chats, and walk-bys, set time aside in “focus vaults” where you are completely unreachable to the outside world for a set period of time. When you emerge, you can have complete freedom to check emails and Facebook, batching those communications so you don’t lose IQ points switching to and from them during the actual work.

Another example is how we use the tech itself. For instance, if you know you can’t resist checking the screen when your phone dings—turn off the sound. Or disable your computer’s internet connection for a period of time. Even something as simple as making your application window full-screen encourages your brain to focus on the single task.

Normalizing simple, focus-wise habits like these throughout your enterprise can reap huge rewards in workplace productivity. As technology starts to fill our offices with artificially intelligent robots, virtual work spaces, and self-configuring environments, you can be confident that you will use the technology to accomplish your goals—rather than letting the technology use you.

References

  1. Boyd, Stowe. “Millennials and the Workplace,” Gigaom.com. Oct 26, 2016. https://gigaom.com/2016/10/26/millennials-and-the-workplace-2/.
  2. Dell & Intel Future-Ready Workforce Study U.S. Report. July 15, 2016. http://www.workforcetransformation.com/workforcestudy/us/.
  3. Workfront 2016-2017 US State of Enterprise Work Report. Sept 9, 2016. https://resources.workfront.com/workfront-awareness/2016-state-of-enterprise-work-report-u-s-edition.
  4. Kris Duggan, “Feeling Distracted by Politics? 29% of Employees Are Less Productive after U.S. Election,” BetterWorks, February 7, 2017, https://blog.betterworks.com/feeling-distracted-politics-29-employees-less-productive-u-s-election.
  5. Juline E. Mills, Bo Hu, Srikanth Beldona, and Joan Clay, “Cyberslacking! A Wired-Workplace Liability Issue,” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42, no. 5 (2001): 34–47, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010880401800562.
  6. Sean Casey, “2016 Nielsen Social Media Report,” Nielsen, January 17, 2017, 6, http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2017-reports/2016-nielsen-social-media-report.pdf.
  7. “Emails ‘Hurt More than Pot,’” CNN.com, April 22, 2005, http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/22/text.iq

<EOF>

So, recently with my own group at work we’ve been trying to work on online training.  We’ve found that there are just too many distractions when at our desks with many people around us, and walk-ups, and the constant interruptions from email, Slack, other projects going on, etc.  We decided the best option (besides working from home cough cough) is to find an unused conference room armed with only a laptop, and to take an hour or two away from it all to concentrate on the training.  I hadn’t before heard this called a “focus vault”, but that is a very appropriate and descriptive term.

Two UPSs and a CX4

One of the big things I had to get done by mid-September was a data migration project that involved working to decommission an EMC CX4-960 array after moving all of its data to a VNX 7500 system. This took many months for several reasons:

  • At the beginning, we wanted to do a full set of testing of different VNX drive configurations since the VNX gave us more options than were available on the old CX4 (and we wanted to be quite certain of performance before committing).
  • It took some time to move the data as non-intrusively as possible. There was only one time that several production server reboots were necessary (for upgrading HBA drivers and multipathing software) before those servers could connect to the VNX.
  • A whole lotta little daily projects and firefights that came up in the meantime while this was going on.

Fortunately I work with a great bunch of people who were involved in the data migration and once a date was set for the CX4 to be powered down, we worked together to make it happen. And it was a great feeling to turn that sucker off… well, after the lurking, incriminating doubts subsided (“Wait, wait, am I absolutely SURE there’s nothing else connected to the array?!?”). I learned a lot about array-based migration tools for EMC arrays like SAN Copy and MirrorView, and especially about how to automate them via NaviCLI scripting! This will come in handy in the near future as I’m currently working on the second part of this VNX migration project; we have a second older CX4 that will be migrated to a second new VNX 7500. Fun times!

—-

The other huge project in September involved removing two big UPS systems from our computer room and replacing them with newer ones. It started as a meeting with the electricians, the UPS company rep, and several of us from the company. Since this outage was going to take several days, it was decided early on to happen over a weekend to minimize impact and we scheduled it a few months out. Because of how we have our computer room powered, we were going to lose power to half of the hardware in the computer room twice… once while the power feed was cut over to our generator, then a second time to bring power back over to the UPS lines. For my group, we were responsible for identifying the systems that would have to be gracefully powered down before their power was cut. Wow, that took some time because we haven’t been the best at, er, keeping internal documentation up-to-date and the power sockets all labeled (but it’s much better now! :D).

Once the hardware was identified, all the other groups here at work that used those hardware systems had to go over the list and decide the order that the systems were to be brought down. To date, this was probably our biggest internal change that affected the most number of people in our office (save the times we’ve physically moved from one office space to another). Our Change Management group took on this part of the project and did a great job organizing the sequence of events and all the inter-dependencies. It took MANY meetings and much explanation and clarification along the way to be sure everyone was fully aware of and understood the extent of this outage.

All of that organization was worth it. Starting Friday morning, non-essential systems were taken offline. This progressed through the day with orderly shutdowns of the affected components, then all power circuits for the UPSs were shut off by 7pm. The electricians moved these circuits over to generator power and we got everything started up again in reverse order. Of course there were a few minor hiccups, but it did go very smoothly. One thing that kept going through my mind, over and over… “No surprises!”, meaning that if I missed something major early in in the project, like misidentifying what hardware was on which circuit and then having an UNplanned outage… well, I was breathing a lot easier by this point.

By Sunday morning the electricians and UPS engineers were ready for us to cut over our power from generator to the new UPS power. They were about eight or so hours ahead of schedule so people got called in early and the whole shutdown/startup process happened again. Again, probably a few hiccups, but it seemed to go swimmingly.

It was quite a feeling of accomplishment being involved with so many people working together in such coordination to make a huge project come together. There were some who put in a lot more hours than than me on this and I hope they got the credit they deserved. I feel that sense of accomplishment every time we have worked on things like this in the past… but this one felt an order of magnitude larger. I’m certain there will be more like it on the horizon, but it’s sure nice that they don’t happen very frequently!

Published
Categorized as SAN, Work

The number one ability

I’ve thought about this many times since I got involved in computers as a full-time occupation (and it occurred to me yet again this past week as we held a couple interviews for an intern spot in our group). It comes up when I see or hear discussions about what a person needs if they want to get into a computer-related job, which I would say are mostly programming (software) or system administration (OS and hardware). What is the one ability or skill that a person must have if they are to excel in these lines of work? What, could you say, is a basic prerequisite ability or skill needed to make it?

I believe it can be answered with a simple question: How are you at problem solving? I’m not talking about Sudoku or Scrabble. I want to know about how you handle tackling problems that you encounter, not just at work, but also in general, in life itself of which work is only a part. How you go about analyzing a broken system (whether it’s a PC or server, or C code for an app, or your truck’s clutch going out, or the home water heater quitting, etc.) and come up with a plan tells me a lot about how you will perform in working in IT.

I feel that this is the absolutely most critical ability that has got me to where I am today. It was a developing factor in my life way before I hit the work force. I think for about any person, it’s adopting an attitude early in life where you decide that you will try to work out a problem on your own (for me, it started out in fixing up my own bikes). It’s about learning how to analyze and think through your situation, look at the tools you have available, consider your options, and see what you yourself can do about it. I’m so grateful for a dad who was a do-it-yourselfer, and I’m trying to instill this attitude in my own children.

I admit, there are some areas in which my first reaction is to call in help (electrician work!). And there are plenty of times when it just finally comes down to having to start a support case. But, I know I’ll make every possible effort to figure any issue out on my own. I don’t think it’s a matter of being too prideful, it’s just in my nature to figure it out on my own.

Published
Categorized as Work

Blame the SAN

Over the years, I wish I would have kept track of all the times that my SAN at work was blamed for causing problems.  It’s on my mind today after some work we did…

In our main facility, we have a Cisco MDS 9513 Director class chassis, with eight internal switch modules.  Looking at it from a high level, the switches work similarly to ethernet switches, as they basically allow connections between the end devices plugged into the ports.  Connections are controlled by zones which can be compared to network VLANs, in that a zone allows its included devices or end points to talk to each other.  A basic zone, for example, could be configured to include Server A and the ports associated with Storage Array B so that the server could access the luns on that storage array.  In my switches and probably a common setting for most others, if a given server is not included in a zone, it can’t talk to anything else.  Good for security as well as sanity!

So, this morning a couple FC attached tape drives were installed, and I connected them up to the MDS.  Once powered up and with the switch ports activated I configured them just like normal.  I zoned them up with several OpenVMS servers as they would be the ones using the tape drives for backup.  After the servers scanned for available new connections, they were drawing a blank.  Why weren’t the drives showing up?  It must be a problem with the SAN.  I double checked my end a couple times and nothing was amiss.  It was a similar configuration to other FC attached tape drives we have had online for years, so I was highly doubtful that now some aspect of it would be failing.

It turned out that there were some OS-specific scanning options that needed to be done so that the server systems could recognize the new drives, so all was well in the end.  And it only took a few hours to get to that point.

I am not writing this to vent or to complain, because I believe everything we do, right or wrong, is a learning experience for those involved.  I am not trying to put the blame back on any other system administrator, because I too have probably been guilty before of the mentality that says it can’t be a problem with my stuff, it has to be yours.  I do know, though, from many years of experience that a lot of times I’ve seen fellow workers get very defensive when a problem comes up and have been quick to point fingers at others only to find later it was their own issue.  I do know that my own systems, like the FC switches, have worked without issue for a very long time, and I trust that a new change similar to what I’ve done dozens of times in the past is going to work just like normal.

I also know that I am willing to do what I can to help someone out in trying to figure out an issue, especially if it involves my hardware.  I may not know everything (well, of course not!) but I’ll give you what I can.  Please, don’t just keep saying it’s the SAN… what are you doing on your end to help figure it out?

Published
Categorized as SAN, Work

Data migrations

By the middle of last year, I was up against a data crunch.  I have three older model HP EVA 8×00 arrays totally full of fiber channel drives (one rack each, no expansions), and the two oldest were around 95% full of data (yes… the growth got away from me with several major requests for lun space).  The third one was my safety valve but was also filling up faster than I liked.  Decisions… buy expansion racks or maybe try to migrate in higher capacity drives?  Either option was a lot of work, and it was pretty obvious due to the cost in time and effort and ongoing maintenance, not to mention the ill feelings about investing in older technology, that I needed to do some shopping for new hardware.

Working with our HP vendor, we arranged for a new EVA p6550 that got installed a couple months ago.  With newer, 2.5″ SAS drives, and only half populated, it would easily hold all the data from those two old EVAs, with room to spare!  Using the built-in Continuous Access software, we started a data migration plan that will be complete by next month.  The data replication groups were VERY easy to configure, took only a few days to sync up, and run in the background without any issues.  It does unfortunately require the reboot of all servers that are connected to the EVAs (HP Alphaservers and Itaniums running OpenVMS… hmmm, that’s worth another post…) to convert from their old array connections to the new p6550 but this has worked out well in coordination with our regularly scheduled maintenance.  I am also relieved that I can add in more drives to accommodate for 100% growth all in that single rack system.

Our first “big” SAN array, way back in the day, was an HP EVA5000.  It was a bit buggy at the time, but each iteration of the EVA that we implemented has only gotten better and they’ve been a reliable and solid bedrock upon which our company has built our storage infrastructure.

Published
Categorized as SAN, Work

Projects and Kanban

One of the issues that my group faces is our backlog of projects.  Early in 2012 we all sat down with our lists of different things we were working on, or had been stacking up because we were not able to get to them.  Once we had them all down in a spreadsheet format, our manager was able to prioritize them based on business needs.  We thought this was a good start on getting a handle on all the things that were on our plates.

Later in the year our company opted to go with the kanban way of organizing our work (the kanban way of tracking projects is definitely worth its own post!).  This involved getting projects down on notecards that are kept on a large board on a wall so that they can be moved around as they are worked on.  This concept is wonderful for allowing everyone who is interested to see what each of us is working on.  If they have a project for us, they can follow its progress across the board.  But, there was no way that we could find to put definitive overall project priorities on these kanban projects that is so easy to see in a spreadsheet format.

Unfortunately, we are still at an impasse on how to proceed on this.  Today we took our (now several months-old) project spreadsheet and gave it a good update.  We’re also trying to clean up our kanban board (some time ago we switched from a physical board to a digital web format).  Somehow we’re going to combine the two…

Revealed: The jobs that will be wiped out by cloud computing

From:

[http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/cio-insights/revealed-the-jobs-that-will-be-wiped-out-by-cloud-computing/39748762?tag=nl.e101]

By Nick Heath
May 29, 2012, 5:08 AM PDT

Takeaway: As businesses switch to cloud computing demand for some traditional IT roles will plummet – but new, different jobs will be created instead.

Tech industry experts are predicting that demand for certain tech roles will dramatically decline over the next decade as organisations switch to cloud computing.

By 2020 the majority of organisations will rely on the cloud for more than half of their IT services, according to Gartner’s 2011 CIO Agenda Survey.

After organisations have switched to the cloud the number of staff needed to manage and provision individual pieces of IT infrastructure – the likes of networks, storage and servers – can be scaled back, as much of the virtualised infrastructure that cloud is built upon can be automated.

The upshot will be whereas 70 per cent of IT resources are devoted to operating IT infrastructure today, by 2020 just 35 per cent of resources will be used in operations, according to the Gartner report New Skills for the New IT.

Bye, bye server admins?

John Rivard, Gartner research director said that, while there will still be roles for people who want to specialise in particular infrastructure, in general IT professionals are going to need a grasp of corporate demands “or the business will bypass them”.

“The cloud is an ability to commoditise the non-differentiating aspects of IT, and increasingly IT’s role in differentiating the business is bigger and bigger,” he said.

“The kinds of roles are definitely going to change: you’re going to see much more automation, more cloud capabilities and less hands-on administration. Across the board, every organisation that I talk to is asking ‘How can I use less of the resources that I have on the run, and more of it on driving the business?’.”

There will be a move away from the IT specialist said Rivard, the kind of person who knows Wintel servers inside out and sleeps with technical manual, towards what he calls “versatilists”, who are skilled in multiple areas of IT and business and who readily “absorbs” new information.

As the Gartner report puts it, “the skill profiles for the new IT will, in many cases, be a hybrid of business and IT skills”.

In this new world, the report said, business designers and technology innovators will devise IT to support new ways of doing business, information architects and process designers will design and implement collaborative business processes that will allow for increased process automation, while solution integrators, service brokers and demand managers will manage a diverse group of cloud and non-cloud vendors.

New types of tech job

The shift towards cloud-based IT services and how it will change tech roles was a hot topic at the recent EMC World conference in Las Vegas. Howard Elias, COO for information infrastructure and cloud services at storage giant EMC, said: ”There are not going to be fewer people involved in IT, but they will be involved in IT in different ways.

“If you are a server, storage or network admin, there may be fewer of those dedicated – what I call siloed component – skillsets needed.”

While these roles disappear, new jobs will spring up in their place both technical – focused on marshalling different services and technologies, and business orientated – analysing huge data stores for valuable insights and matching technologies to the needs of business and customers.

“We are going to need a lot more of what I would call data centre architects or cloud architects, where you still need to know enough about servers, network and storage, but you also need to know how they integrate and interact together, and most importantly understand the management and automation that occurs on top of that to deliver that IT as a service,” he said.

EMC is backing training and certification schemes for two roles it believes will be core to the future of business IT; cloud architect and data scientist. Cloud architects will deliver virtualisation and cloud designs to suit business needs, while data scientists will apply advanced analytics techniques to petabyte scale databases to identify beneficial business trends.

IT professionals looking to transition into one of these new, more business-orientated roles will also face competition not just from other techies, but from business analysts and graduates who’ve trained to fill these positions.

Gartner’s Rivard said that business-minded techies and technology-literate business types will be equally eligible for these new posts: “They can come from either side, but they’ve got to be individuals who want to continue lifelong learning and master all of it.”

And now for some good news…

But despite the competition for these new roles Rivard doesn’t expect IT professionals will struggle to find work.

“You’ve got the baby boomer retirement that’s going to take a significant part of legacy staff off the map. Also I don’t think we’re producing enough graduates on the technology or the business side, so I expect there is going to be a competition for the talent.”

EMC’s Elias said that IT professionals should see the change as an opportunity to broaden their professional opportunities.

“This is the challenge of creative disruption,” he said.

“As that happens there is more opportunity for everybody, some people are going to say ‘I don’t like that new opportunity’ and that is going to be a challenge for them, and there are those who want to embrace it, and believe me there are going to be more interesting jobs than there were in the past.

“You’ve got to take control of your career, it’s more about the individual, and the individual’s got to take the initiative.”

The challenge ahead

IT infrastructure managers are aware of the challenge of shifting the skillset of their workforce higher up the business value chain – service management and business partnership skills was the most commonly identified area in need of improvement in a recent Gartner poll of infrastructure managers.

“They clearly see that, within IT, those are the skills that are needed, and those are the ones that are going to be hardest to get,” said Rivard.

IT is in a constant state of flux with technologies coming and going every year, said Rivard, and so expects IT professionals to be able to handle the coming change.

“IT people are in this field because it changes; if they weren’t they’d be pouring concrete,” said Rivard.

“They generally like the technology changes, but these technology changes are driving them beyond just technology skills to become overall business leaders.”

These old eyes

I once chortled when a coworker (same age as I) used his phone camera to take a pic of a serial number on a piece of hardware that was printed in a tiny font, just so he could enlarge it to read it easily. But my laughing days are over, since in the past year I’ve had to start using reading glasses to see anything up close, and I feel his pain now. Getting old is depressing.