Copland OS Enterprise

Came across this image some time ago and thought it would make a cool desktop background:

After a bit of googling and looking around, turns out it’s from an anime series called Serial Experiments Lain (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_Experiments_Lain]). In the fictional world is a company called Tachibana Industries, and it is supposed to be kinda like Apple. They make the HandiNAVI: “NAVI is the abbreviation of Knowledge Navigator, and the HandiNAVI is based on the Apple Newton, one of the world’s first PDAs.” I think that would be a good nickname for my iPhone…

Published
Categorized as iPhone

Another Android strike

Sure am glad for my iPhone, as I take my grain of salt:

[http://www.pcworld.com/article/245380/ios_safer_from_malware_than_android_security_firm_says.html#tk.nl_dnx_h_crawl]

iOS Safer from Malware than Android, Security Firm Says

Bummer for Android

Wow… Only 141 MILLION phones have been giving up a lot of really personal data for a long time. Oh, and to check if your phone is running this software, you have to root it, thus breaking your warranty. Real nice…

[http://gigaom.com/mobile/how-to-check-if-your-android-phone-uses-carrieriq/]

“Updated. More than 141 million smartphones are now running software that can log everything a user does and sees, including private web browsing, incoming texts and even which buttons are pressed. The application, called CarrierIQ, runs in the background unbeknownst to consumers and captures user and phone data as evidenced in this video shown on Wednesday. So how does one know if their handset is running the CarrierIQ software?

While details of how widespread CarrierIQ’s service are still coming to light, all of the demonstrations so far have shown it on Google Android phones. There is some evidence that Apple’s iOS had CarrierIQ integration two years ago, but no data showing that it’s currently in use. For now then, the focus is on Android, and there is an application that can tell you if CarrierIQ is on your Android phone. Update: Your phone needs to be rooted for this app to work.

The free software is available from the XDA-Developers site, where CarrierIQ’s activity was first pointed out. The app, pointed out by TheVerge, is bare-bones and was quickly developed by Trevor Eckhart, the person who demonstrated on video exactly what CarrierIQ is capable of. His detection software is called an .apk file, which is the standard Google Android application installation method, so don’t panic if you’re not familiar with the term .apk.

Eckhart has several versions of the software available at the bottom of the XDA topic page; at last check I saw seven, because he added more security detection features as he developed the app. The one of most interest, however, is the CarrierIQ check, which is performed with a button tap after the app is installed.

I ran Eckhart’s app on my Samsung Galaxy Tab and Google Nexus One; both are free of CarrierIQ software, but I expected that. Both devices run custom versions of Android that I installed myself. CarrierIQ is installed in the software versions from either a carrier or a hardware maker, and since I’ve overwritten their software, there’s practically zero chance that my devices are spying on me.”

Solid state storage

Consumer SSDs are finally down to $1 per gigabyte… and the cheapest 32GB flash drive just hit the $30 mark (even cheaper today after a rebate). Nice.

Published
Categorized as Computers

Battery tech

I really, really hate battery technology today. Pathetic and lamentable. But here’s an article of 25 “breakthroughs” that will maybe hopefully SOME DAY find their way into our electronic devices…

[http://gigaom.com/cleantech/25-battery-breakthroughs-for-gadgets-electric-cars-the-grid/]

Published
Categorized as Article

Cutting the cord

My family, not long ago and after much research and a nagging sense of FUD, finally cancelled our home landline phone. It was equal feelings of “Oh man, what if there’s an emergency and we can’t call 911!?!?!” and “Stick it, CenturyTel, I’m keeping my money!” But I think we made a good decision, and here are several reasons why.

The biggest hold out for us from going cellphone-only was the “emergency” need for a phone line. That’s the thing about having a landline, you can pretty much count on there ALWAYS being a dial-tone. Example scenarios (yeah, the mind can think up a LOT of schtuff like this):

  • I and/or my wife are home with the kids, and one or both of us were incapacitated, how would the kids call 911 quickly?
  • We have a house fire, everyone get out quick! Could we call 911?
  • Wife and I are on a date, kids are at home, can we be sure they can call us in an emergency?

What if the cell service were down or the cell phone didn’t work?! Can you realistically count on a cell phone working all the time? What if it loses power? What if the electricity is off for days on end, how will you charge it?

Here’s what we decided. We’ve had three cellular lines for some time (mine, wife’s, and for another family member), and worked it out last year so that we would have that third line/phone at our home almost all the time. This has become our “emergency” line, since that phone very rarely leaves the house, and is definitely there when my wife and I are both gone from home. That phone has a great battery and can go like four days of being constantly on, and I bet if we kept it turned off (like during an extended power outage) except to make a call or two, it could go a couple weeks with enough juice. Add to that our other two phones, and I think that’s covered. (Note to self, get a big 2Kva UPS for the computers and to stand-in in the event of a long power outage.)

I also can’t forget that we’ve got many neighbors nearby. If I conk myself out or have some sort of debilitating physical issue, it’s going to take an ambulance or first-responder quite a few minutes to get to me. So the minute or so it takes for someone in the house to run over to a neighbors house (IF none of three cell phones in the house will work) probably isn’t going to make much difference anyway. Say we had a fire and all had to get out of the house quickly and can’t call 911, I bet that extra minute running over to the neighbors wouldn’t make that much difference either.

Those are just a couple examples. It’s really playing the odds game. What are the odds that some event will happen where you MUST make a call out, and THREE phones are not working OR the cell tower is down AND you can’t find a neighbor home?

(As an aside, I talked with our local emergency response office that handles 911 calls about how well cell phones work, and if I could somehow register my address with them. They didn’t have the option of linking my home address with the cell number, but they seemed assured that they could triangulate the phone’s position if they were called. I think this is dubious of the phone is inside my home, unless cell phones use some “magic” form of GPS that can penetrate building structures. Oh well.)

I hate to mention this right after a paragraph that takes into consideration our human lives… but this point affects me in the wallet. 🙂 We’ve been dumping probably around an average of $28 a month over to CenturyTel or the previous phone carrier since… well, since forever. That’s just for basic service, no extras. Since my wife and I have had cell phones since at least 2002, we’ve been paying on that, too. True, considering the level of cell phone service back then, and the poor coverage even up til this past year, we couldn’t have gone cell-phone-only any sooner than now. It’s just such a great feeling to use that $28 every month for some other budget area! Everyone likes to save!

On a social aspect of killing off our landline, I hated answering that phone. I would bet that 95% of the time, it was a call for my wife. I don’t mind not being popular, trust me! 🙂 So I was for the vast majority of the time passing the phone to her, or having to take a note to give to her later. How many times I SO wanted to say “Can you just call her on her cell phone?” It was a relief to tell people, after we cancelled the landline, if you want my wife, here’s her number. If you want me, here’s my number. The third number we don’t give out at all. Sweet deal!

Along with this, we had to decide which number we needed to put down for business use. It didn’t take much of an argument (from me) for us to decide that it should be my wife’s phone. Sweet, again! I dallied with the option of setting up a virtual number, like Google Talk, to use as our “home” number for businesses to call us. My thinking was that it wouldn’t be a “real” number and had options like to send all calls to voicemail if we wanted, and could also do call-blocking, but my wife thought it was irrelevant. I see her point… now that we have number portability, her number will always be hers, like mine will always be mine. I’m just protective of my number and only want family and friends and people at work to have it.

Robots

Wake me when the robots are here. Real robots.

Seriously, I’m this close to checking out on the robot scene for another couple decades, at least. I’ve been reading Popular Mechanics and Popular Science mags for many years now (true, not the definitive source for robot research, but they do cover most developments), and the perennial favorite subject is robotics. They’ve been a popular subject for almost as long as those publications have been around, judging from excerpts from old articles and photos. What hasn’t changed in the past 50 or 60 years is the concept of where robots will be only 20 or 30 years “in the future.” Well, we are long past due to be in that speculative future robo-topia.

Frankly, it’s incredibly depressing that our 2010 technology has only produced an Asimo. It’s so sad that the most common “robot” known by consumers right now is the Roomba. Computers and processors have advanced so rapidly (Moore’s Law is still holding strong) but our robot technology crawls at a snail’s pace. I’m tired of how the media, such as the Popular Mech/Sci mentioned above, plays up the robots in development today. As an example, a recent PopSci flashed this on the cover: “THE FUTURE OF ROBOTS — YOUR HELPER BOT HAS ARRIVED — America’s First Humanoid.” From the article, that thing could barely even stand on its own. Its creators were trying to get it to kick a soccer ball. Stand. And kick a ball.

There is NO person or group or educational program today that is putting all the pieces together. Sure, we are more miniaturized today with circuits and electronics and wiring, but there is no compelling design that is showing to be better than another. For instance, what should be used to move a robot’s appendages? A contracting material that works like a muscle? A threaded bolt-like structure that spins? A bladder that uses compressed air? What about the power source? Battery technology today just plain won’t cut it (another pet peeve of mine), which pretty much means any autonomous robot will have to remain tethered. Where is the AI technology that should be making use of the advanced computation power we have today? Can’t we even come up with a hexapod (which I think is one of the most useful and versatile of robot types) that can be used in a real-world application?

Thanks to Hollywood, we do have a pretty high standard set in our minds for what an autonomous, fully functioning android or humanoid robot should be. Terminators come to mind. It’s easy to let the bar be set so high and to get so jaded by those visions of what we may possibly create. But is it really too much to ask? When will we have anything that even gives us a real, true glimpse of that reality, instead of making us grimace?

Til then, here’s to all the roboticists in their various bailiwicks and the work they are doing. Keep it up, work hard… but don’t bother me again until you have something worth my time and attention.

WP7 is out

News flash!

[http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/7006554/133557294/343176/0/]

Lack of buzz on WP7 raises questions about sales
Windows Phone 7 smartphones have been on sale for more than three weeks in the U.S. and seem to be producing little buzz and only so-so sales.

And this is news because . . . ??

Political views

From theadvocates.org website, which has a nice quick quiz to tell you where you are. I fall between conservative and libertarian, which was no surprise.

Political Philosophies

Left (Liberal)
Liberals usually embrace freedom of choice in personal matters, but tend to support significant government control of the economy. They generally support a government-funded “safety net” to help the disadvantaged, and advocate strict regulation of business. Liberals tend to favor environmental regulations, defend civil liberties and free expression, support government action to promote equality, and tolerate diverse lifestyles.

Libertarian
Libertarians support maximum liberty in both personal and economic matters. They advocate a much smaller government; one that is limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence. Libertarians tend to embrace individual responsibility, oppose government bureaucracy and taxes, promote private charity, tolerate diverse lifestyles, support the free market, and defend civil liberties.

Centrist
Centrist prefer a “middle ground” regarding government control of the economy and personal behavior. Depending on the issue, they sometimes favor government intervention and sometimes support individual freedom of choice. Centrists pride themselves on keeping an open mind, tend to oppose “political extremes,” and emphasize what they describe as “practical” solutions to problems.

Right (Conservative)
Conservatives tend to favor economic freedom, but frequently support laws to restrict personal behavior that violates “traditional values.” They oppose excessive government control of business, while endorsing government action to defend morality and the traditional family structure. Conservatives usually support a strong military, oppose bureaucracy and high taxes, favor a free-market economy, and endorse strong law enforcement.

Statists (Big Government)
Statists want government to have a great deal of power over the economy and individual behavior. They frequently doubt whether economic liberty and individual freedom are practical options in today’s world. Statists tend to distrust the free market, support high taxes and centralized planning of the economy, oppose diverse lifestyles, and question the importance of civil liberties.

Published
Categorized as Article

Choose two

From [http://www.harvardnsj.com/2010/04/cybersecurity-and-national-policy/]:

Those with either an engineering or management background are aware that one cannot optimize everything at once — that requirements are balanced by constraints. I am not aware of another domain where this is as true as it is in cybersecurity and the question of a policy response to cyber insecurity at the national level. In engineering, this is said as “Fast, Cheap, Reliable: Choose Two”. In the public policy arena, we must first remember the definition of a free country: a place where that which is not forbidden is permitted. As we consider the pursuit of cybersecurity, we will return to that idea time and time again; I believe that we are now faced with “Freedom, Security, Convenience: Choose Two”.

Published
Categorized as Security